This week in AIS we were talking about Mr. O'connors jury duty for a signifigant amount of time in call one day and what the bias's might be or are when lawyers pick who should be on a jury. And when Mr. O'connor brought up that alot of the time people pick a person who might not have such an extensive education as another person. And it got me thinking how corrupt that could end up for example if a case were very complicated or around those lines and no one on the jury could follow or no one could have the expierence to apply there opinions to give a fair trial. I've read numerous books by one of my favorite authors Jodi Picoult and in all of her books there is always a trial and i believe that she really captures and get down the lingo of a court room in her books and from that expierene i've started to notice when watching Law and Order and other shows or movies that have to do with a trial that just a simple finger pointed or an opinion shouted out before objection can be called can ruin someones life and it's interesting how corrupt or what a disadvantage a case can be at for a poor man.